La crítica posmoderna de la ciencia: una genealogía francesa

Ciencia Ergo Sum 4 (2):223-229 (1997)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Postmodern thought has focused itself on the critique of modern epistemology that was founded on a clear distinction between the knowing subject and the object of knowledge. For postmodern thought such a distinction is non-existent or dubious at best. Postmodernism has carried to its logical conclusion the postulates of structuralism; therefore, for postmodern thought there is no general intrinsic meaning in a fact of thing, but there are only particular ways for attributing meaning to such facts and things. Hereunder, we attempt to trace the genealogy of postmodern thought on the history and philosophy of science, because science, traditionally regarded as the summit of knowledge and rationality by modern epistemology, has not been immune to the wholesale critique practiced by this new school of philosophical cynicism that we call postmodernism.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ARALCP-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-02-16
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-02-16

Total views
34 ( #36,971 of 42,173 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #30,838 of 42,173 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.