Metacognitive feelings, self-ascriptions and metal actions

Philosophical Inquiries 2 (1):145-162 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The main aim of this paper is to clarify the relation between epistemic feel- ings, mental action, and self-ascription. Acting mentally and/or thinking about one’s mental states are two possible outcomes of epistemic or metacognitive feelings. Our men- tal actions are often guided by our E-feelings, such as when we check what we just saw based on a feeling of visual uncertainty; but thought about our own perceptual states and capacities can also be triggered by the same E-feelings. The first section of the pa- per presents Dokic’s argument for the insufficiency of the “ascent routine” to account for non-transparent cases of self-ascription, as well as his account of E-feelings. The second section then presents a two-level model of metacognition that builds on Dokic’s account and my own view of the issue. The two-level model links E-feelings to a min- dreading capacity in order to account for non-transparent self-ascriptions. Finally, the third section develops a deeper characterization of the relation among E-feelings, mental action, and self-ascription of mental states based on epistemic rules. In the context of self-knowledge, these remarks suggest the existence of means of forming self-ascriptions other than the ascent routine.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-03-29
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Truly Understood.Peacocke, Christopher

View all 37 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
552 ( #7,161 of 50,430 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
28 ( #21,892 of 50,430 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.