Aesthetic Supererogation

Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics 54 (1):102-116 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many aestheticians and ethicists are interested in the similarities and connections between aesthetics and ethics (Nussbaum 1990; Foot 2002; Gaut 2007). One way in which some have suggested the two domains are different is that in ethics there exist obligations while in aesthetics there do not (Hampshire 1954). However, Marcia Muelder Eaton has argued that there is good reason to think that aesthetic obligations do exist (Eaton 2008). We will explore the nature of these obligations by asking whether acts of aesthetic supererogation (acts that go beyond the call of our aesthetic obligations) are possible. In this paper, we defend the thesis that there is good reason to think such acts exist.

Author Profiles

Lauren Ware
University of Kent
Alfred Archer
Tilburg University

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-04-03

Downloads
531 (#15,396)

6 months
27 (#38,328)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?