Laugh It Off: Moral Admiration and Humorous Humility

In David W. Shoemaker, Oxford Studies in Agency and Responsibility, Volume 9. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 193–211 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

First, this chapter argues that praise, as an expression of moral admiration, disrupts moral equality, in terms of equal relationships of accountability, that underpins the practices of moral communities. The disruption created by elevating the admired person to a position of moral superiority is called the pedestal problem. Second, this chapter contends that deflecting praise, rather than accepting or rejecting praise, is the most effective way to counteract the moral inequality introduced by moral admiration. Finally, this chapter introduces the phenomenon of humorous humility and explores how it serves as an effective strategy for deflecting praise and avoiding the pedestal problem.

Author's Profile

Migdalia Arcila-Valenzuela
Cornell University

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-03-25

Downloads
25 (#105,793)

6 months
25 (#103,727)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?