Wondering about what you know

Analysis 78 (4):anx162 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In a series of recent papers, Jane Friedman has argued that attitudes like wondering, enquiring, and suspending judgement are question-directed and have the function of moving someone from a position of ignorance to one of knowledge. Call such attitudes interrogative attitudes. Friedman insists that all IAs are governed by the following Ignorance Norm: Necessarily, if one knows Q at t, then one ought not have an IA towards Q at t. However, I argue that key premisses in Friedman’s argument actually point towards an opposing conclusion; namely, that IAs are not governed by the Ignorance Norm, and IAs have functions other than moving someone from a position of ignorance to one of knowledge. I conclude that the Ignorance Norm should be rejected.
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-02-19
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Suspended Judgment.Friedman, Jane

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
97 ( #24,530 of 40,134 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #23,814 of 40,134 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.