Wondering about what you know

Analysis 78 (4):anx162 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In a series of recent papers, Jane Friedman has argued that attitudes like wondering, enquiring, and suspending judgement are question-directed and have the function of moving someone from a position of ignorance to one of knowledge. Call such attitudes interrogative attitudes. Friedman insists that all IAs are governed by the following Ignorance Norm: Necessarily, if one knows Q at t, then one ought not have an IA towards Q at t. However, I argue that key premisses in Friedman’s argument actually point towards an opposing conclusion; namely, that IAs are not governed by the Ignorance Norm, and IAs have functions other than moving someone from a position of ignorance to one of knowledge. I conclude that the Ignorance Norm should be rejected.
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-02-19
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Know How.Stanley, Jason
Suspended Judgment.Friedman, Jane
Why Suspend Judging?Friedman, Jane

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Game of Belief.Maguire, Barry & Woods, Jack

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
154 ( #25,384 of 48,825 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
37 ( #19,103 of 48,825 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.