Against ‘permanent sovereignty’ over natural resources

Politics, Philosophy and Economics 14 (2):129-151 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The doctrine of permanent sovereignty over natural resources is a hugely consequential one in the contemporary world, appearing to grant nation-states both jurisdiction-type rights and rights of ownership over the resources to be found in their territories. But the normative justification for that doctrine is far from clear. This article elucidates the best arguments that might be made for permanent sovereignty, including claims from national improvement of or attachment to resources, as well as functionalist claims linking resource rights to key state functions. But it also shows that these defences are insufficient to justify permanent sovereignty and that in many cases they actually count against it as a practice. They turn out to be compatible, furthermore, with the dispersal of resource rights away from the nation-state which global justice appears to demand
Categories
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ARMAPS
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-01-11
View other versions
Added to PP index
2014-03-25

Total views
143 ( #28,854 of 52,730 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #47,402 of 52,730 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.