Against ‘permanent sovereignty’ over natural resources

Politics, Philosophy and Economics 14 (2):129-151 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The doctrine of permanent sovereignty over natural resources is a hugely consequential one in the contemporary world, appearing to grant nation-states both jurisdiction-type rights and rights of ownership over the resources to be found in their territories. But the normative justification for that doctrine is far from clear. This article elucidates the best arguments that might be made for permanent sovereignty, including claims from national improvement of or attachment to resources, as well as functionalist claims linking resource rights to key state functions. But it also shows that these defences are insufficient to justify permanent sovereignty and that in many cases they actually count against it as a practice. They turn out to be compatible, furthermore, with the dispersal of resource rights away from the nation-state which global justice appears to demand
Categories
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ARMAPS
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-01-11
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2014-03-25

Total views
86 ( #24,369 of 38,991 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #29,015 of 38,991 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.