Gravity as Archimedes? Thrust and a Bifurcation in that Theory

Foundations of Physics 34 (11):1703-1724 (2004)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Euler’s interpretation of Newton’s gravity (NG) as Archimedes’ thrust in a fluid ether is presented in some detail. Then a semi-heuristic mechanism for gravity, close to Euler’s, is recalled and compared with the latter. None of these two ‘‘gravitational ethers’’ can obey classical mechanics. This is logical since the ether defines the very reference frame, in which mechanics is defined. This concept is used to build a scalar theory of gravity: NG corresponds to an incompressible ether, a compressible ether leads to gravitational waves. In the Lorentz–Poincaré version, special relativity is compatible with the ether, but, with the heterogeneous ether of gravity, it applies only locally. A correspondence between metrical effects of uniform motion and gravitation is assumed, yet in two possible versions (one is new). Dynamics is based on a (non-trivial) extension of Newton’s second law. The observational status for the theory with the older version of the correspondence is summarized
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-05-19
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
203 ( #21,713 of 51,475 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #49,634 of 51,475 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.