Die Fallstricke einer intentionalistischen Engführung der Geschichtsdeutung

Erwã¤Gen Wissen Ethik 26:60-65 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this commentary I criticise Doris Gerber's intentionalistic reading of history. While an intentionalistic philosophy of history has some plausibility, a *purely* intentionalistic view is often irreconcilable with the most elementary common sense. For example, that history ought to be considered exclusively as the history of human action and not of things that simply happen to humans as well - like the outbreak of the volcano Vesuv in the year 79 which lead to the destructions of Pompeii. Or that historical value judgments should always be judgments about the reasons for human action, which raises the questions if and how the unintended consequences of human action are to be judged.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-06-06
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
36 ( #45,556 of 50,504 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #45,228 of 50,504 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.