Teleosemantics, Infotel-semantics and Circularity

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Peter Godfrey-Smith and Nicholas Shea have argued that standard versions of teleosemantics render explanations of successful behavior by appealing to true beliefs circular and, consequently, non-explanatory. As an alternative, Shea has recently suggested an original teleosemantic account (that he calls ?Infotel-semantics?), which is supposed to be immune to the problem of circularity. The paper argues that the standard version of teleosemantics has a satisfactory reply to the circularity objection and that, in any case, Infotel-semantics is not better off than standard teleosemantics
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ARTTIA-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-07-11
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2014-06-03

Total downloads
161 ( #14,830 of 36,000 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
28 ( #12,071 of 36,000 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.