Teleosemantics, Infotel-semantics and Circularity

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Peter Godfrey-Smith and Nicholas Shea have argued that standard versions of teleosemantics render explanations of successful behavior by appealing to true beliefs circular and, consequently, non-explanatory. As an alternative, Shea has recently suggested an original teleosemantic account (that he calls ?Infotel-semantics?), which is supposed to be immune to the problem of circularity. The paper argues that the standard version of teleosemantics has a satisfactory reply to the circularity objection and that, in any case, Infotel-semantics is not better off than standard teleosemantics
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2014-07-11
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
344 ( #20,275 of 65,725 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #39,552 of 65,725 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.