Consistency and moral integrity: A self-determination theory perspective

The Journal of Moral Education:1-14 (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
If acting morally can be viewed as acting consistently with a moral principle or rule, then being a person with moral integrity can be viewed as consistently applying moral principles or rules across different types of situations. We advance a view of moral integrity that incorporates three distinct, but interrelated, types of moral consistency: cognitive, emotional and motivational moral consistency. Our approach is based on Self-Determination Theory, a motivational theory that can explain when a moral rule becomes the primary motive for behavior. We argue that moral integrity is achieved when a person acts on the basis of an internal moral system of principles, emotions and motives and provide an account of the way that it develops during a person’s interaction with the environment.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ARVCAM
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-11-29
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Sources of Normativity.Korsgaard, Christine M.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-11-29

Total views
83 ( #32,427 of 45,585 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
83 ( #7,611 of 45,585 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.