Educational Justice and School Boosting

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
School boosters are tax-exempt organizations that engage in fundraising efforts to provide public schools with supplementary resources. This paper argues that prevailing forms of school boosting are defeasibly unjust. Section 1 shows that inequalities in public education funding in the United States violate John Rawls’s two principles of domestic justice. Section 2 argues that prevailing forms of school boosting exacerbate and plausibly perpetuate these injustices. Section 3 then contends that boosting thereby defeasibly violates Rawlsian principles of nonideal theory for rectifying injustice. Thus, boosting should be presumptively either made illegal or substantially reformed. Finally, Section 4 responds to potential objections.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ARVEJA
Upload history
First archival date: 2022-06-15
Latest version: 2 (2022-06-15)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2022-06-15

Total views
274 ( #28,469 of 71,342 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
274 ( #1,612 of 71,342 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.