Internal Reasons and the Boy Who Cried Wolf

Ethics 130 (1):32-58 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Reasons internalists claim that facts about normative reasons for action are facts about which actions would promote an agent’s goals and values. Reasons internalism is popular, even though paradigmatic versions have moral consequences many find unwelcome. This article reconstructs an influential but understudied argument for reasons internalism, the “if I were you” argument, which is due to Bernard Williams and Kate Manne. I raise an objection to the argument and argue that replying to it requires reasons internalists to accept controversial metaethical or epistemological commitments with which their theory has not traditionally been associated.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ASAIRA
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-10-28
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-09-12

Total views
118 ( #31,006 of 51,451 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
43 ( #13,047 of 51,451 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.