Some comments on the begriffsschrift and natural language

Philosophical Papers 12 (2):32-38 (1983)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
If the begriffsschrift from Frege does represent the logical form of natural language it either lacks a logical form itself, or its logical form is different to that of natural language. But Frege insists that his notation has a logical form. So the second disjunct holds. This suggests that Frege's notation will generate consequences different to those that can be derived with natural language, with its different logical form. For anyone looking for "a means of avoiding misunderstandings", as Frege does, this would be unpalatable, to say the least.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ASCSCO
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-04-22
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Conceptual Notation and Related Articles.Corcoran, John & Levin, David

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2010-08-24

Total views
69 ( #29,710 of 41,616 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #34,378 of 41,616 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.