Language as an instrument of thought

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I show that there are good arguments and evidence to boot that support the language as an instrument of thought hypothesis. The underlying mechanisms of language, comprising of expressions structured hierarchically and recursively, provide a perspective (in the form of a conceptual structure) on the world, for it is only via language that certain perspectives are avail- able to us and to our thought processes. These mechanisms provide us with a uniquely human way of thinking and talking about the world that is different to the sort of thinking we share with other animals. If the primary function of language were communication then one would expect that the underlying mechanisms of language will be structured in a way that favours successful communication. I show that not only is this not the case, but that the underlying mechanisms of language are in fact structured in a way to maximise computational efficiency, even if it means causing communicative problems. Moreover, I discuss evidence from comparative, neuropatho- logical, developmental, and neuroscientific evidence that supports the claim that language is an instrument of thought.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ASOLAA
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-11-17
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Relevance, Communication and Cognition.Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre
Natural Language and Natural Selection.Pinker, Steven & Bloom, Paul

View all 41 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-11-17

Total views
453 ( #5,177 of 38,048 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
116 ( #2,874 of 38,048 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.