Sins and Risks in Underreporting Suspected Adverse Drug Reactions

Philosophy of Medicine 5 (1) (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The underreporting of suspected adverse drug reactions remains a primary issue for contemporary post-market drug surveillance or ‘pharmacovigilance.’ Pharmacovigilance pioneer W.H.W. Inman argued that ‘deadly sins’ committed by clinicians are to blame for underreporting. Of these ‘sins,’ ignorance and lethargy are the most obvious and impactful in causing underreporting. However, recent analyses show that diffidence, insecurity, and indifference additionally play a major role. I aim to augment our understanding of diffidence, insecurity, and indifference by arguing these sins are underwritten by value judgments arising via epistemic risk. I contend that ‘evidence-based’ medicine codifies these sins.

Author's Profile

Austin Due
East Tennessee State University

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-05-02

Downloads
159 (#89,963)

6 months
87 (#66,193)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?