Stalnaker’s thesis in context

Review of Symbolic Logic 8 (1):131-163 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this paper I present a precise version of Stalnaker's thesis and show that it is both consistent and predicts our intuitive judgments about the probabilities of conditionals. The thesis states that someone whose total evidence is E should have the same credence in the proposition expressed by 'if A then B' in a context where E is salient as they have conditional credence in the proposition B expresses given the proposition A expresses in that context. The thesis is formalised rigorously and two models are provided that demonstrate that the new thesis is indeed tenable within a standard possible world semantics based on selection functions. Unlike the Stalnaker-Lewis semantics the selection functions cannot be understood in terms of similarity. A probabilistic account of selection is defended in its place. -/- I end the paper by suggesting that this approach overcomes some of the objections often leveled at accounts of indicatives based on the notion of similarity.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-08-08
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
On Conditionals.Edgington, Dorothy
Inquiry.Barwise, Jon
Indicative Conditionals.Stalnaker, Robert
Groupthink.Russell, Jeffrey Sanford; Hawthorne, John & Buchak, Lara

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
If P, Then P!Mandelkern, Matthew

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
391 ( #10,841 of 48,877 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
58 ( #10,946 of 48,877 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.