Why Composition Matters

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 50 (8):934-949 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Many say that ontological disputes are defective because they are unimportant or without substance. In this paper, we defend ontological disputes from the charge, with a special focus on disputes over the existence of composite objects. Disputes over the existence of composite objects, we argue, have a number of substantive implications across a variety of topics in metaphysics, science, philosophical theology, philosophy of mind, and ethics. Since the disputes over the existence of composite objects have these substantive implications, they are themselves substantive.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BAIWCM
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-11-12
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-11-12

Total views
1,401 ( #2,629 of 2,432,670 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1,058 ( #228 of 2,432,670 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.