An Absolutist Theory of Faultless Disagreement in Aesthetics

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (3):429-448 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Some philosophers writing on the possibility of faultless disagreement have argued that the only way to account for the intuition that there could be disagreements which are faultless in every sense is to accept a relativistic semantics. In this article we demonstrate that this view is mistaken by constructing an absolutist semantics for a particular domain – aesthetic discourse – which allows for the possibility of genuinely faultless disagreements. We argue that this position is an improvement over previous absolutist responses to the relativist's challenge and that it presents an independently plausible account of the semantics of aesthetic discourse.

Author Profiles

Carl Baker
University of Leeds (PhD)
Jon Robson
Nottingham University

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-07-30

Downloads
744 (#20,225)

6 months
163 (#19,445)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?