Expression and Guidance in Schroeder’s Expressivist Semantics

Erkenntnis 83 (4):829-852 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Mark Schroeder’s expressivist program has made substantial progress in providing a compositional semantics for normative terms. This paper argues that it risks achieving this semantic progress at the cost of abandoning a key theoretical motivation for embracing expressivism in the first place. The problem can be summarized as a dilemma. Either Schroeder must allow that there are cases in which agents are in disagreement with one another, or can make valid inferences, but that these disagreements or inferences are not expressible in natural language; or his version of expressivism must abandon one of the key theoretical advantages expressivist theories seemed to possess over cognitivism, the ability to provide a very straightforward explanation of the action- and attitude-guiding role of normative judgments.
Keywords
Categories
Reprint years
2017, 2018
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BAKEAG-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-06-11
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-06-11

Total views
97 ( #22,926 of 39,017 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #22,201 of 39,017 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.