Theravāda Buddhism, Finite Fine-grainedness, and the Repugnant Conclusion

Journal of Buddhist Ethics 32:1-28 (2025)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to Finite Fine-grainedness (roughly), there is a finite sequence of intuitively small differences between any two welfare levels. The assumption of Finite Fine-grainedness is essential to Gustaf Arrhenius’s favored sixth impossibility theorem in population axiology and plays an important role in the spectrum argument for the (Negative) Repugnant Conclusion. I argue that Theravāda Buddhists will deny Finite Fine-grainedness and consider the space that doing so opens up—and fails to open up—in population axiology. I conclude with a lesson for population axiology that generalizes beyond the Buddhist context: to plausibly deny Finite Fine-grainedness, we must locate a welfare good—such as the good of awakening (bodhi)—with some rather esoteric axiological properties.

Author's Profile

Calvin Baker
Princeton University

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-01-30

Downloads
91 (#98,912)

6 months
91 (#64,287)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?