Indexical Reliabilism and the New Evil Demon

Erkenntnis 78 (6):1317-1336 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Stewart Cohen’s New Evil Demon argument raises familiar and widely discussed concerns for reliabilist accounts of epistemic justification. A now standard response to this argument, initiated by Alvin Goldman and Ernest Sosa, involves distinguishing different notions of justification. Juan Comesaña has recently and prominently claimed that his Indexical Reliabilism (IR) offers a novel solution in this tradition. We argue, however, that Comesaña’s proposal suffers serious difficulties from the perspective of the philosophy of language. More specifically, we show that the two readings of sentences involving the word ‘justified’ which are required for Comesaña’s solution to the problem are not recoverable within the two-dimensional framework of Robert Stalnaker to which he appeals. We then consider, and reject, an attempt to overcome this difficulty by appeal to a complication of the theory involving counterfactuals, and conclude the paper by sketching our own preferred solution to Cohen’s New Evil Demon
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BALBRA
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-08-14
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Knowledge and its Limits.Williamson, Timothy
Counterfactuals.Lewis, David K.
Semantics in Generative Grammar.Heim, Irene & Kratzer, Angelika

View all 35 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Accessibilism Defined.Hatcher, Michael

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-01-24

Total views
369 ( #8,088 of 40,684 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
35 ( #16,841 of 40,684 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.