Book Review: A Critique of the Moral Defense of Vegetarianism [Book Review]

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Smith makes his case against V-ism by appeals to (i) plant sentience, and (ii) the Transitivity of Eating principle [by which V-ans eat animals, since plants feed on decomposed animals]. By (i), V-ans are inconsistent in their prohibitions; by (ii) V-ism is impossible. But, I argue, Smith and his beloved omnivore animists face similar pressures, insofar as they prohibit cannibalism.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BALBRA-2
Upload history
First archival date: 2016-05-19
Latest version: 2 (2016-05-27)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2016-05-19

Total views
186 ( #27,234 of 2,410,259 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #39,673 of 2,410,259 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.