Epistemic Trespassing

Nathan Ballantyne

Epistemic Trespassing

Mind 128 (510):367-395 (2019)

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers

Abstract

Epistemic trespassers judge matters outside their field of expertise. Trespassing is ubiquitous in this age of interdisciplinary research and recognizing this will require us to be more intellectually modest.

Keywords

epistemology social epistemology expertise interdisciplinary research higher-order evidence specialized research

Categories

Disagreement in Philosophy in Metaphilosophy

Disagreement, Misc in Epistemology

Epistemology, General Works in Epistemology

Epistemology, Misc in Epistemology

Social Epistemology, Misc in Epistemology

(categorize this paper)

DOI

10.1093/mind/fzx042

PhilPapers/Archive ID

BALET-2

Upload history

Archival date: 2020-03-23
View other versions

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-02-12

Total views
10,065 ( #158 of 64,121 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9,153 ( #7 of 64,121 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload

This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.

Applied ethics	Epistemology	History of Western Philosophy	Meta-ethics	Metaphysics	Normative ethics
Philosophy of biology	Philosophy of language	Philosophy of mind	Philosophy of religion	Science Logic and Mathematics	More ...