Connective conceptual analysis and psychology

Theory and Psychology 22 (3):310-323 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Conceptual analysis, like any exclusively theoretical activity, is far from overrated in current psychology. Such a situation can be related both to the contingent influences of contextual and historical character and to the more essential metatheoretical reasons. After a short discussion of the latter it is argued that even within a strictly empirical psychology there are non-trivial tasks that can be attached to well-defined and methodologically reliable, conceptual work. This kind of method, inspired by the ideas of Ludwig Wittgenstein, Peter Strawson (conceptual grammar), and Gilbert Ryle (conceptual geography), is proposed and formally depicted as being holistic, descriptive, and connective. Finally, the newly presented framework of connective conceptual analysis is defended against the “Charge from Psychology,” in a version developed by William Ramsey, claiming that conceptual analysis is based on psychological assumptions that have already been refuted by empirical psychology.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-10-10
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Concepts, Analysis, Generics and the Canberra Plan.Johnston, Mark & Leslie, Sarah-Jane

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
354 ( #12,536 of 50,329 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #22,752 of 50,329 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.