The Case for Ernst Mach's Neutral Monism

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper, for two upcoming volumes, makes what I consider to be the definitive textual case for finally rejecting the phenomenalist interpretation of Ernst Mach's works, and his customary association with the Vienna Circle, in favor of a stronger realistic neutral monist reading connecting him to James, Russell and the American realist movement and today's neutral monism (for example my 2014). I hope that this reading will eventually supplant the previously mistaken view of Mach's work and that his views of science and philosophy of space and time can be revised as well.
No keywords specified (fix it)
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2017-06-29
Latest version: 3 (2017-07-12)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
117 ( #21,314 of 39,588 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
34 ( #14,230 of 39,588 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.