Capturing naive validity in the Cut-free approach

Synthese:1-17 (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Rejecting the Cut rule has been proposed as a strategy to avoid both the usual semantic paradoxes and the so-called v-Curry paradox. In this paper we consider if a Cut-free theory is capable of accurately representing its own notion of validity. We claim that the standard rules governing the validity predicate are too weak for this purpose and we show that although it is possible to strengthen these rules, the most obvious way of doing so brings with it a serious problem: an internalized version of Cut can be proved for a Curry-like sentence. We also evaluate a number of possible ways of escaping this difficulty.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BARCNV
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-06-28
View other versions
Added to PP index
2016-09-02

Total views
65 ( #51,830 of 2,449,104 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #36,344 of 2,449,104 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.