Capturing naive validity in the Cut-free approach

Synthese 199 (Suppl 3):707-723 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Rejecting the Cut rule has been proposed as a strategy to avoid both the usual semantic paradoxes and the so-called v-Curry paradox. In this paper we consider if a Cut-free theory is capable of accurately representing its own notion of validity. We claim that the standard rules governing the validity predicate are too weak for this purpose and we show that although it is possible to strengthen these rules, the most obvious way of doing so brings with it a serious problem: an internalized version of Cut can be proved for a Curry-like sentence. We also evaluate a number of possible ways of escaping this difficulty.

Author Profiles

Eduardo Alejandro Barrio
Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA)
Lucas Rosenblatt
Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA)

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-09-02

Downloads
113 (#88,059)

6 months
405 (#4,421)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?