Debunking Arguments and Metaphysical Laws

Philosophical Studies (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I argue that one’s views about which “metaphysical laws” obtain—including laws about what is identical with what, about what is reducible to what, and about what grounds what—can be used to deflect or neutralize the threat posed by a debunking explanation. I use a well-known debunking argument in the metaphysics of material objects as a case study. Then, after defending the proposed strategy from the charge of question-begging, I close by showing how the proposed strategy can be used by certain moral realists to resist the evolutionary debunking arguments.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BARDAA-13
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-06-02
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
To Be F Is To Be G.Cian Dorr - 2016 - Philosophical Perspectives 30 (1):39-134.

View all 47 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Debunking Arguments.Korman, Daniel Z.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-03-31

Total views
336 ( #11,793 of 46,197 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
192 ( #2,341 of 46,197 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.