Harms and Wrongs in Epistemic Practice

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This volume has its roots in two recent developments within mainstream analytic epistemology: a growing recognition over the past two or three decades of the active and social nature of our epistemic lives; and, more recently still, the increasing appreciation of the various ways in which the epistemic practices of individuals and societies can, and often do, go wrong. The theoretical analysis of these breakdowns in epistemic practice, along with the various harms and wrongs that follow as a consequence, constitutes an approach to epistemology that we refer to as non-ideal epistemology. In this introductory chapter we introduce and contextualise the ten essays that comprise this volume, situating them within four broad sub-fields: vice epistemology, epistemic injustice, inter-personal epistemic practices, and applied epistemology. We also provide a brief overview of several other important growth areas in non-ideal epistemology.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BARHAW-4
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-11-15
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Vice Epistemology.Cassam, Quassim
What Is Sexual Orientation?Dembroff, Robin A.

View all 64 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-11-14

Total views
95 ( #23,183 of 38,976 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
95 ( #4,001 of 38,976 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.