How Close Are Impossible Worlds? A Critique of Brogaard and Salerno’s Account of Counterpossibles

Dialectica 73 (3):315-329 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Several theorists have been attracted to the idea that in order to account for counterpossibles, i.e. counterfactuals with impossible antecedents, we must appeal to impossible worlds. However, few have attempted to provide a detailed impossible worlds account of counterpossibles. Berit Brogaard and Joe Salerno’s ‘Remarks on Counterpossibles’ is one of the few attempts to fill in this theoretical gap. In this article, I critically examine their account. I prove a number of unanticipated implications of their account that end up implying a counterintuitive result. I then examine a suggested revision and point out a surprising implication of the revision.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-02-24
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Remarks on Counterpossibles.Brogaard, Berit & Salerno, Joe
Omission Impossible.Bernstein, Sara

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
106 ( #32,403 of 50,504 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #25,766 of 50,504 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.