Luminosity Guaranteed

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (S1):480-496 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This article aims to show that Williamson's anti-luminosity argument does not succeed if we presuppose a constitutive connection between the phenomenal and the doxastic. In contrast to other luminists, however, my strategy is not to critically focus on the refined safety condition in terms of degrees of confidence that anti-luminists typically use in this context. Instead, I will argue that, given a certain conception of what Chalmers calls ‘direct phenomenal concepts,’ luminosity is guaranteed even if the refined safety condition in terms of degrees of confidence is taken for granted.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years
2017
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BARLG-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-09-05
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Knowledge and its Limits.Williamson, Timothy
Philosophical investigations.Wittgenstein, Ludwig & Anscombe, G. E. M.
Luminosity and the Safety of Knowledge.Neta, Ram & Rohrbaugh, Guy

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-05-19

Total views
73 ( #25,325 of 38,057 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
34 ( #11,317 of 38,057 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.