Moral uncertainty and permissibility: Evaluating Option Sets

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46 (6):1-26 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this essay, we explore an issue of moral uncertainty: what we are permitted to do when we are unsure about which moral principles are correct. We develop a novel approach to this issue that incorporates important insights from previous work on moral uncertainty, while avoiding some of the difficulties that beset existing alternative approaches. Our approach is based on evaluating and choosing between option sets rather than particular conduct options. We show how our approach is particularly well-suited to address this issue of moral uncertainty with respect to agents that have credence in moral theories that are not fully consequentialist.
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BARMUA
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-05-31
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Why Maximize Expected Choice‐Worthiness?1.MacAskill, William & Ord, Toby
Moral Uncertainty.Bykvist, Krister

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-05-31

Total views
465 ( #7,868 of 46,314 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
114 ( #5,047 of 46,314 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.