On the correct treatment of inverted earth

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89 (3):294-311 (2008)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The Inverted Earth case has seen fierce debate between Ned Block, who says it defeats the causal-covariational brand of wide representationalism about qualia, and Michael Tye and Bill Lycan, who say it does not. The debate has generated more heat than light because of a failure to get clear on who is supposed to be proving what, and what premises can be deployed in doing so. I argue that a correct understanding of the case makes it clear that the causal covariation theory is in deeper trouble over Inverted Earth than is generally supposed even by the theory's detractors.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BAROTC-4
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-08-26
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Mental Paint.Block, Ned

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
244 ( #11,126 of 38,084 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #18,371 of 38,084 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.