On the correct treatment of inverted earth

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89 (3):294-311 (2008)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The Inverted Earth case has seen fierce debate between Ned Block, who says it defeats the causal-covariational brand of wide representationalism about qualia, and Michael Tye and Bill Lycan, who say it does not. The debate has generated more heat than light because of a failure to get clear on who is supposed to be proving what, and what premises can be deployed in doing so. I argue that a correct understanding of the case makes it clear that the causal covariation theory is in deeper trouble over Inverted Earth than is generally supposed even by the theory's detractors.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BAROTC-4
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-08-26
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
775 ( #6,016 of 2,427,991 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
364 ( #1,039 of 2,427,991 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.