Simple is not easy

Synthese 193 (7):2261-2305 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
I review and challenge the views on simplicity and its role in linguistics put forward by Ludlow. In particular, I criticize the claim that simplicity—in the sense pertinent to science—is nothing more than ease of use or “user-friendliness”, motivated by economy of labor. I argue that Ludlow’s discussion fails to do justice to the diversity of factors that are relevant to simplicity considerations. This, in turn, leads to the neglect of crucial cases in which the rationale for simplification is unmistakably epistemic, as well as instances where simplicity is part of the content of substantive, empirical hypotheses. I illustrate these points with examples from the history of generative linguistics, such as: the shaping influence exerted by simplicity, via its involvement in the notion of “linguistically significant generalization”, its methodological and substantive contribution to the goal of explanatory adequacy, and its central role in the Minimalist Program’s search “beyond explanatory adequacy”.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-08-06
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 43 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
434 ( #9,810 of 50,097 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
64 ( #8,697 of 50,097 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.