Wickedness Redux

Philo 14 (2):137-160 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Some philosophers have argued that the concepts of evil and wickedness cannot be well grasped by those inclined to a naturalist bent, perhaps because evil is so intimately tied to religious discourse or because it is ultimately not possible to understand evil, period. By contrast, I argue that evil—or, at least, what it is to be an evil person—can be understood by naturalist philosophers, and I articulate an independently plausible account of evil character
Keywords
ISBN(s)
1098-3570
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BARWR
Upload history
First archival date: 2009-06-08
Latest version: 3 (2009-07-16)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-06-09

Total views
1,377 ( #2,792 of 2,439,598 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
38 ( #18,698 of 2,439,598 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.