What Second-Best Scenarios Reveal about Ideals of Global Justice

In Thom Brooks (ed.), Oxford Handbook to Global Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
While there need be no conflict in theory between addressing global inequality (inequalities between people worldwide) and addressing domestic inequality (inequalities between people within a political community), there may be instances in which the feasible mechanism for reducing global inequality risks aggravating domestic inequality. The burgeoning literature on global justice has tended to overlook this type of scenario, and theorists espousing global egalitarianism have consequently not engaged with cases that are important for evaluating and clarifying the content of their theories. This chapter explores potential tensions between promoting global and domestic inequality. We introduce a class of second-best scenarios that global justice theorists have neglected to demonstrate the importance of such scenarios as an aid to constructing and evaluating ideals of global justice.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BARWSS
Upload history
First archival date: 2015-09-12
Latest version: 2 (2019-10-27)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2015-09-13

Total views
258 ( #18,793 of 53,484 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
67 ( #8,607 of 53,484 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.