What Second-Best Scenarios Reveal about Ideals of Global Justice

In Thom Brooks (ed.), Oxford Handbook to Global Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
While there need be no conflict in theory between addressing global inequality (inequalities between people worldwide) and addressing domestic inequality (inequalities between people within a political community), there may be instances in which the feasible mechanism for reducing global inequality risks aggravating domestic inequality. The burgeoning literature on global justice has tended to overlook this type of scenario, and theorists espousing global egalitarianism have consequently not engaged with cases that are important for evaluating and clarifying the content of their theories. This chapter explores potential tensions between promoting global and domestic inequality. We introduce a class of second-best scenarios that global justice theorists have neglected to demonstrate the importance of such scenarios as an aid to constructing and evaluating ideals of global justice.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BARWSS
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-09-12
Latest version: 2 (2019-10-27)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
What is the Point of Equality?Anderson, Elizabeth S.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-09-13

Total views
160 ( #22,966 of 46,167 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
25 ( #29,610 of 46,167 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.