Why Zeno’s Paradoxes of Motion are Actually About Immobility

Foundations of Science 23 (4):649-679 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Zeno’s paradoxes of motion, allegedly denying motion, have been conceived to reinforce the Parmenidean vision of an immutable world. The aim of this article is to demonstrate that these famous logical paradoxes should be seen instead as paradoxes of immobility. From this new point of view, motion is therefore no longer logically problematic, while immobility is. This is convenient since it is easy to conceive that immobility can actually conceal motion, and thus the proposition “immobility is mere illusion of the senses” is much more credible than the reverse thesis supported by Parmenides. Moreover, this proposition is also supported by modern depiction of material bodies: the existence of a ceaseless random motion of atoms—the ‘thermal agitation’—in the scope of contemporary atomic theory, can offer a rational explanation of this ‘illusion of immobility’. Our new approach to Zeno’s paradoxes therefore leads to presenting the novel concept of ‘impermobility’, which we think is a more adequate description of physical reality.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BATWZP
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
A Beautiful Supertask.Laraudogoitia, Jon Perez

View all 44 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-11-09

Total views
151 ( #18,553 of 39,935 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
39 ( #13,296 of 39,935 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.