Nozick's defense of closure

In Kelly Becker & Tim Black (eds.), The Sensitivity Principle in Epistemology. Cambridge University Press. pp. 11--27 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper argues against common views that at least in many cases Robert Nozick is not forced to deny common closure principles. More importantly, Nozick does not – despite first (and second) appearances and despite his own words – deny closure. On the contrary, he is defending a more sophisticated and complex principle of closure. This principle does remarkably well though it is not without problems. It is surprising how rarely Nozick’s principle of closure has been discussed. He should be seen not so much as a denier of closure than as someone who’s proposing an alternative, more complex principle of closure.
Keywords
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BAUNDO
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-03-30
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2014-02-01

Total views
147 ( #17,023 of 37,949 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
42 ( #8,966 of 37,949 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.