Spatial opinion dynamics and the effects of two types of mixing

Physical Review E 98 (2):022310 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Spatially situated opinions that can be held with different degrees of conviction lead to spatiotemporal patterns such as clustering (homophily), polarization, and deadlock. Our goal is to understand how sensitive these patterns are to changes in the local nature of interactions. We introduce two different mixing mechanisms, spatial relocation and nonlocal interaction (“telephoning”), to an earlier fully spatial model (no mixing). Interestingly, the mechanisms that create deadlock in the fully spatial model have the opposite effect when there is a sufficient amount of mixing. With telephoning, not only is polarization and deadlock broken up, but consensus is hastened. The effects of mixing by relocation are even more pronounced. Further insight into these dynamics is obtained for selected parameter regimes via comparison to the mean-field differential equations.
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-11-07
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
206 ( #35,411 of 71,146 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #46,875 of 71,146 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.