Vagueness Intuitions and the Mobility of Cognitive Sortals

Minds and Machines 22 (3):213-234 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
One feature of vague predicates is that, as far as appearances go, they lack sharp application boundaries. I argue that we would not be able to locate boundaries even if vague predicates had sharp boundaries. I do so by developing an idealized cognitive model of a categorization faculty which has mobile and dynamic sortals (`classes', `concepts' or `categories') and formally prove that the degree of precision with which boundaries of such sortals can be located is inversely constrained by their flexibility. Given the literature, it is plausible that we are appropriately like the model. Hence, an inability to locate sharp boundaries is not necessarily because there are none; boundaries could be sharp and it is plausible that we would nevertheless be unable to locate them.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BAUVIA
Revision history
Archival date: 2012-04-12
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Vagueness.Williamson, Timothy
The Instability of Philosophical Intuitions: Running Hot and Cold on Truetemp.Swain, Stacey; Alexander, Joshua & Weinberg, Jonathan
Categories and Concepts.Smith, Edward E. & Douglas, L.

View all 40 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-04-12

Total views
367 ( #6,851 of 38,052 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #22,406 of 38,052 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.