Property theory: The Type-Free Approach v. the Church Approach

Journal of Philosophical Logic 23 (2):139 - 171 (1994)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In a lengthy review article, C. Anthony Anderson criticizes the approach to property theory developed in Quality and Concept (1982). That approach is first-order, type-free, and broadly Russellian. Anderson favors Alonzo Church’s higher-order, type-theoretic, broadly Fregean approach. His worries concern the way in which the theory of intensional entities is developed. It is shown that the worries can be handled within the approach developed in the book but they remain serious obstacles for the Church approach. The discussion focuses on: (1) the fine-grained/coarse-grained distinction, (2) proper names and definite descriptions, (3) the paradox of analysis and Mates’ puzzle, and (4) the logical, semantical, and intentional paradoxes.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BEAPTT
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-12-19
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Situations and Attitudes.Barwise, Jon & Perry, John
Frege's Puzzle.Salmon, Nathan U.

View all 61 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
242 ( #10,696 of 37,117 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #15,674 of 37,117 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.