The incoherence of empiricism

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Radical empiricism is the view that a person's experiences (sensory and introspective), or a person's observations, constitute the person's evidence. This view leads to epistemic self-defeat. There are three arguments, concerning respectively: (1) epistemic starting points; (2) epistemic norms; (3) terms of epistemic appraisal. The source of self-defeat is traced to the fact that empiricism does not count a priori intuition as evidence (where a priori intuition is not a form of belief but rather a form of seeming, specifically intellectual as opposed to sensory). Moderate rationalism, by contrast, avoids self-defeat.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BEATIO
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-12-18
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
1,178 ( #3,198 of 58,376 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
113 ( #5,205 of 58,376 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.