No Coincidence?

Oxford Studies in Metaethics 9:102-125 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This paper critically examines coincidence arguments and evolutionary debunking arguments against non-naturalist realism in metaethics. It advances a version of these arguments that goes roughly like this: Given a non-naturalist, realist metaethic, it would be cosmically coincidental if our first order normative beliefs were true. This coincidence undermines any prima facie justification enjoyed by those beliefs.

Author's Profile

Matthew Bedke
University of British Columbia


Added to PP

580 (#21,070)

6 months
71 (#40,511)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?