Contingent laws rule: reply to Bird

Analysis 62 (3):252-255 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In a recent paper (Bird 2001), Alexander Bird argues that the law that common salt dissolves in water is metaphysically necessary - and he does so without presupposing dispositionalism about properties. If his argument were sound, it would thus show that at least one law of nature is meta- physically necessary, and it would do so without illicitly presupposing a position (dispositionalism) that is already committed to a necessitarian view of laws. I shall argue that Bird's argument is unsuccesful.

Author's Profile

Helen Beebee
University of Leeds


Added to PP

324 (#31,674)

6 months
60 (#26,827)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?