How Different Kinds of Disagreement Impact Folk Metaethical Judgments

In Jennifer Cole Wright & Hagop Sarkissian (eds.), Advances in Experimental Moral Psychology. Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 167-187 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Th e present article reports a series of experiments designed to extend the empirical investigation of folk metaethical intuitions by examining how different kinds of ethical disagreement can impact attributions of objectivity to ethical claims.

Author's Profile

James R. Beebe
State University of New York, Buffalo

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-11-28

Downloads
363 (#23,658)

6 months
22 (#44,363)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?