How Different Kinds of Disagreement Impact Folk Metaethical Judgments

In Jennifer Cole Wright & Hagop Sarkissian (eds.), Advances in Experimental Moral Psychology. Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 167-187 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Th e present article reports a series of experiments designed to extend the empirical investigation of folk metaethical intuitions by examining how different kinds of ethical disagreement can impact attributions of objectivity to ethical claims.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BEEHDK
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-11-28
View other versions
Added to PP index
2016-11-28

Total views
296 ( #21,810 of 2,448,854 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #39,469 of 2,448,854 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.