Hume’s Two Definitions

Hume Studies 37 (2):243-274 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Hume's two definitions of causation have caused an extraordinary amount of controversy. The starting point for the controversy is the fact, well known to most philosophy undergraduates, that the two definitions aren't even extensionally equivalent, let alone semantically equivalent. So how can they both be definitions? One response to this problem has been to argue that Hume intends only the first as a genuine definition—an interpretation that delivers a straightforward regularity interpretation of Hume on causation. By many commentators' lights, however, this is a bug rather than a feature: such an account of the two definitions leaves necessary connection out of Hume's story about the meaning of "cause" ..
Keywords
Categories
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years
2013
ISBN(s)
0319-7336
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BEEHTD
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-12-12
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-03-13

Total views
370 ( #11,849 of 50,121 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
73 ( #7,347 of 50,121 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.