Immortality, Boredom, and Standing for Something

In Travis Timmerman & Michael Cholbi (eds.), Exploring the Philosophy of Death and Dying: Classic and Contemporary Perspectives (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Addresses a common criticism of Williams' so-called "Necessary Boredom Thesis," arguing that the criticism misconstrues the kind of boredom that Williams is worried about. Then offers an independent reason to worry about the Necessary Boredom Thesis, given the relevant construal of boredom. Finally, develops a weaker version of Williams' worries about choosing to live an immortal existence, arguing that immortality threatens to undermine our ability to stand for the things in our lives.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-02-02
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
167 ( #35,019 of 64,121 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
32 ( #23,118 of 64,121 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.