Towards a Unified Notion of Disagreement

Grazer Philosophische Studien 88 (1):139-159 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The recent debate on Semantic Contextualism and Relativism has definitely brought the phenomenon of disagreement under the spotlight. Relativists have considered disagreement as a means to accomplish a defence of their own position regarding the semantics of knowledge attributions, epistemic modals, taste predicates, and so on. The aim of this paper is twofold: first, we argue that several specific notions of disagreement can be subsumed under a common “schema” which provides a unified and overarching notion of disagreement. Secondly, we avail ourselves of such a unified notion of disagreement to assess the arguments devised especially by Relativists in order to criticise certain forms of Contextualism, which crucially rely on the idea that Relativism is better suited than Contextualism to capture certain intuitions of disagreement
No keywords specified (fix it)
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-11-22
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Semantic Significance of Faultless Disagreement.Michele Palmira - 2015 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 96 (3):349-371.
Minimal Disagreement.Dan Zeman - forthcoming - Philosophia:1-22.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
105 ( #32,423 of 50,193 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #23,710 of 50,193 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.