The causal efficiency of the passage of time

Philosophia 40 (4):763-769 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Does mere passage of time have causal powers ? Are properties like "being n days past" causally efficient ? A pervasive intuition among metaphysicians seems to be that they don't. Events and/or objects change, and they cause or are caused by other events and/or objects; but one does not see how just the mere passage of time could cause any difference in the world. In this paper, I shall discuss a case where it seems that mere passage of time does have causal powers : Sydney Shoemaker's (1969) possible world where temporal vacua (allegedly) take place. I shall argue that Shoemaker's thought-experiment doesn't really aim at teaching us that there can be time without change, but rather that if such a scenario is plausible at all (as I think it is) it provides us with good reasons to think that mere passage of time can be directly causally efficient.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2013-08-01
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Real Time Ii.Mellor, D. H.
The Unreality of Time.McTaggart, J. Ellis
Causality and Properties.Shoemaker, Sydney
Probability in GRW Theory.Frigg, Roman & Hoefer, Carl

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Sense of Time.Viera, Gerardo

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total downloads
242 ( #10,682 of 37,105 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #15,657 of 37,105 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.