Utilitarianism and animal cruelty: Further doubts

De Ethica 3 (3):5-19 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Utilitarianism has an apparent pedigree when it comes to animal welfare. It supports the view that animal welfare matters just as much as human welfare. And many utilitarians support and oppose various practices in line with more mainstream concern over animal welfare, such as that we should not kill animals for food or other uses, and that we ought not to torture animals for fun. This relationship has come under tension from many directions. The aim of this article is to add further considerations in support of that tension. I suggest three ways in which utilitarianism comes significantly apart from mainstream concerns with animal welfare. First, utilitarianism opposes animal cruelty only when it offers an inefficient ratio of pleasure to pain; while this may be true of eating animal products, it is not obviously true of other abuses. Second, utilitarianism faces a familiar problem of the inefficacy of individual decisions; I consider a common response to this worry, and offer further concerns. Finally, the common utilitarian argument against animal cruelty ignores various pleasures that humans may get from the superior status that a structure supporting exploitation confers.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BENUAA
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-02-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights.Donaldson, Sue & Kymlicka, Will

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-02-21

Total views
1,988 ( #1,047 of 50,320 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
526 ( #503 of 50,320 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.