Was Kant a Kantian About Doxastic States?

In Paul Silva Jr (ed.), On Believing and Being Convinced. Cambridge University Press (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Chapter 7 presents a reconstruction of purely doxastic states in Kant’s theory of assent, focusing on those species of assents that are distinguished solely by the strength of their psychological commitment. It is suggested that Kant held a view similar to the one defended by Paul Silva Jr., according to which (i) our degreed doxastic states can be articulated as degrees of conviction, and (ii) our outright doxastic states — above all, opinion, conviction (simpliciter), and certainty — can be reduced to conviction thresholds. Moreover, it is suggested that Kant’s notion of ‘assent’ (‘Fürwahrhalten’), as the most general doxastic state, comes closest to our present-day notion of ‘belief’, or at least Silva’s account thereof. (NB please read Chapter 7 together with Section 2.1.)

Author's Profile

Christopher Benzenberg
Université de Fribourg

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-08-28

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?